Imagine visiting a website and being instantly recognized—not by name, but through a unique combination of details your device subtly shares: the type of browser you use, your screen resolution, installed plugins, even your time zone. Without any cookies involved, that site might still know it’s you returning. This quiet, behind-the-scenes process is a dynamic tool called browser fingerprinting, increasingly used in themes like fraud prevention and targeted marketing.
Browser fingerprinting is a method of identifying and tracking users based on the unique combination of settings and attributes provided by their browsers and devices. Unlike traditional tracking methods that rely on cookies, fingerprinting gathers a wide array of data points—like HTTP headers, language preferences, system fonts, and more—to build a distinct “fingerprint” for each user. It offers valuable use cases in cybersecurity, such as detecting fraudulent logins or multi-accounting attempts.
How does Browser Fingerprinting work?
Browser fingerprinting works by collecting and analyzing a wide range of data points from a user’s browser and device to build a unique identifier. Even if two users have the same device or operating system, subtle differences — like browser settings, installed plugins, screen resolution, or system fonts — help distinguish one from another. The technique relies on detecting these small variations to craft a digital fingerprint that is specific to each visitor.
What makes browser fingerprinting especially effective is its ability to generate a high-entropy identifier — one that is rich and complex enough to reliably differentiate users. Unlike traditional tracking methods such as cookies, which can be deleted or blocked, fingerprinting uses device and software characteristics that are harder to alter. This gives websites and security platforms a more robust and persistent way to recognize users, detect fraud, and personalize experiences without requiring explicit user identification.
Browser fingerprinting relies on a wide range of attributes to build a unique user profile. These include the type and version of the web browser, the operating system and its version, screen resolution and color depth, installed fonts and plugins, and even when an ad blocker is in use.
Scripts embedded in web pages gather this information passively in the background, examining both the hardware and software environment of the user's device. This process happens seamlessly, without disrupting the user experience, enabling websites to create a detailed and consistent fingerprint for each visitor.
Browser fingerprinting techniques
There are several ways websites acquire and make use of their visitors’ data. Some of the most common methods are Canvas fingerprinting, WebGL fingerprinting, Audio fingerprinting, User-Agent fingerprinting, Language and Timezone settings, and media device fingerprinting. Let us look at what these mean in detail.
- Canvas Fingerprinting
One of the most used fingerprinting techniques, Canvas fingerprinting, uses the HTML5 canvas to draw images or text. It uses this to assess how your browser generates it, thus helping create a unique identifier. Once the image is produced, the webpage’s script reads the pixel data and converts it into a hash- a digital signature of sorts. What’s unique about the pixel data is that it varies from user to user due to different GPUs, operating systems, graphics cards, and hardware.
The hash thus helps websites hold user data and analyze users across different sessions. This method is highly effective since it doesn’t rely on user-stored data (like cookies or local storage). It’s also difficult for users to block without breaking legitimate site functions. It is able to read even small rendering differences between devices to make fingerprints unique. The user remains oblivious to the fingerprinting happening in the background, unlike any other technique, making it a common choice.
- WebGL fingerprint
WebGL fingerprinting leverages the Web Graphics Library (WebGL) — a JavaScript API used for rendering 3D graphics in modern web browsers. Like canvas fingerprinting, it relies on how your device's hardware and software render complex visual tasks, but it dives even deeper into GPU-level rendering.
When a site uses WebGL fingerprinting, it asks your browser to draw a 3D shape. The way that shape is drawn depends on things like your graphics card, browser, operating system, and even your device’s drivers.
Imagine two people visit the same website — one using a MacBook and the other using a Windows PC. The site runs a WebGL script asking both browsers to draw a 3D spinning cube. Even though the cube looks similar on both screens, behind the scenes, the way it's rendered is slightly different:
-The MacBook uses an Apple graphics driver and Safari browser.
-The Windows PC uses a different graphics card, drivers, and Google Chrome.
These tiny differences create a unique "fingerprint" that helps websites recognize your device, even if you're using incognito mode or have cleared your cookies.
- Audio Fingerprinting
When a website wants to generate an audio fingerprint, it uses JavaScript to create and play a small, inaudible sound (usually using the Audio Context API). It doesn’t record your microphone -instead, it analyzes how your device’s hardware and software handle the playback of that sound.
Different devices (and browsers, sound cards, drivers, etc.) might produce slightly different audio outputs, even when playing the exact same signal. These small differences in waveforms and processing times are used to create a fingerprint unique to your system.
Let’s say two users visit a website. Both their browsers generate a sound using the same code, but:
-One user has an older laptop with basic audio drivers.
-The other uses a high-end PC with advanced audio hardware.
Even though they never hear anything, the way each device processes the sound is just different enough for the website to know: “Ah, this is the same person who visited last week."
- User-Agent fingerprinting
User Agent Fingerprinting is one of the simplest techniques used in browser fingerprinting to track and identify users online. Every time you visit a website, your browser shares basic information in a "user agent string." This string includes details like browser name and version, operating system, device type, and rendering engine.
Websites can use this information to customize the content or layout based on your device by tracking your activity, combining it with other fingerprinting techniques (like screen resolution, fonts, etc.) for a more unique profile. Alone, user agent fingerprinting may not be enough to uniquely identify someone. But when combined with other signals, it becomes a valuable piece of the fingerprinting puzzle.
- Language and Time zone settings
Language and timezone settings serve as additional data points that help websites and trackers identify or distinguish between users.
-
Language Settings: Browsers typically share your preferred language settings (like en-US for English - United States or es-ES for Spanish - Spain). This data is part of the HTTP headers and can also be accessed via JavaScript.
Language preferences can vary between users even in the same region. For example, someone in India might have en-GB, en-IN, or even hi-IN as their preferred language. This adds uniqueness to your browser fingerprint. -
Timezone Settings: Your device's local timezone (like GMT+5:30 for New Delhi or GMT-4 for Montreal) is also readable by websites using JavaScript. While timezone alone won’t uniquely identify a user, it becomes more powerful when combined with other attributes. For instance, a user in New York (GMT-5) using Japanese as their language is likely more unique than someone using standard English.
- Media device fingerprinting
Media device fingerprinting identifies or tracks users by gathering details about their audio and video hardware. This method collects data such as the number and types of microphones, webcams, and speakers connected to a device, along with supported audio/video codecs and screen capture capabilities.
Even without access to device labels (which are hidden unless permission is granted), characteristics like the presence of certain media devices and permission statuses can be enough to create a semi-unique fingerprint for tracking purposes. The returned data—such as device type and configuration—can be leveraged to distinguish one user’s setup from another.
Is Browser Fingerprinting legal?
Browser fingerprinting is technically legal in most countries, including India, but its use is governed by broader privacy and data protection laws.
In India, the Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP Act) 2023 outlines principles around collecting, storing, and processing personal data. While browser fingerprinting isn’t explicitly mentioned, it can be considered a form of personal data collection if it can identify a user. That means companies using fingerprinting techniques are expected to obtain clear, informed consent, explain their data use, and ensure that data isn’t retained longer than necessary.
Similarly, global laws like the EU’s GDPR and California’s CCPA also treat fingerprinting data as personal information if it contributes to identifying someone, even without cookies. In these regions, not disclosing such tracking can be deemed a legal violation.
Browser fingerprinting collects dozens of subtle browser and device details, and since fingerprints can't be cleared or easily blocked by users, it makes the practice controversial from a privacy standpoint. However, when used responsibly, such as in fraud detection or bot prevention, fingerprinting can enhance security without compromising trust.
Browser fingerprinting for fraud prevention
When used intelligently, Browser Fingerprinting can detect anomalies, flag suspicious behavior, and prevent high-risk transactions in real time. It’s silent, frictionless, and powerful — making it a core pillar of modern fraud defense strategies.
- Detection of Multi-Accounting
While fraudsters often use different email addresses, phone numbers, or even fake identities to bypass standard detection, browser fingerprinting provides a deeper layer of analysis. It gathers data such as device type, installed fonts, screen resolution, operating system version, browser configuration, and more. These subtle signals form a unique “fingerprint” for each user’s device and browser setup.
Even if the user clears cookies, switches accounts, or uses incognito mode, their underlying device fingerprint usually stays the same (or similar enough). When multiple accounts share this same fingerprint, platforms can detect and block these duplicate users, or flag them for additional review.
- Blocking Automated Bots and Scripts
Fraudsters often deploy bots—automated scripts that mimic human behavior—to perform high-speed, repetitive actions such as creating fake accounts, initiating fake transactions, scraping data, or brute-forcing login credentials. These bots can be highly sophisticated, capable of bypassing traditional CAPTCHA systems or behaving like real users to avoid detection.
Browser fingerprinting acts as an effective line of defense against such bots. When a browser or device visits a site, fingerprinting collects numerous signals like screen size, hardware capabilities, browser plugins, and input patterns. Bots, especially less advanced ones, often fail to replicate these complex and diverse signals accurately. Their behavior may also include anomalies like missing plugins, overly generic headers, or impossible configurations (e.g., a Linux OS with Safari browser), all of which raise red flags.
By analyzing these fingerprints in real time, platforms can detect irregularities that suggest non-human or automated access. Once identified, the system can automatically block these bots, serve them fake data (honey traps), or challenge them with further verification like advanced CAPTCHA or two-factor authentication.
- IP & Proxy Detection
Fraudsters often use proxies, VPNs, or even the Tor network to mask their real IP addresses and locations. This tactic helps them impersonate users from different regions, bypass geo-restrictions, or conceal their identity to carry out malicious activities like money laundering, bonus abuse, or account takeovers.
For example, imagine a user whose IP says they're in India, but their browser's time zone is set to New York, the language preference is Portuguese, and the device characteristics change every few sessions. This inconsistency in fingerprint signals suggests the use of anonymization tools like VPNs or emulators, and possibly fraudulent intent.
Browser fingerprinting enhances fraud detection by tracking various indicators that suggest the use of anonymizing tools. It monitors the reputation of IP addresses and how frequently they change, which can signal suspicious behavior. It also detects Geo-IP mismatches, where the user’s IP location does not align with system configurations like time zone or language settings. Another technique involves analyzing WebRTC leaks, which can inadvertently reveal the user's actual IP address even when a VPN is in use.
- Linked Fraud Rings
Browser fingerprinting helps detect linked fraud rings by identifying common characteristics shared across multiple devices or accounts involved in fraudulent activities. Fraud rings often use various tactics to disguise their true identity, such as using different accounts or changing IP addresses. However, browser fingerprinting can uncover these connections by analyzing unique browser and device attributes, such as screen resolution, operating system, installed plugins, and fonts.
Browser fingerprinting is effective in detecting fraud rings that use bots or automated tools to conduct large-scale fraudulent activities. Fraudsters often deploy these bots across multiple accounts to commit financial crimes or other forms of fraud. Since bots often have certain telltale patterns, like unusual browser behaviors or inconsistencies in their fingerprint profiles, they are easy to detect through fingerprinting.
Conclusion
In an era where privacy and security are often at odds, browser fingerprinting is a powerful tool in the fight against fraud, bots, and abuse. With regulations like India’s DPDP Act and global laws like GDPR, businesses must tread carefully. The future lies in balancing trust with technology, leveraging fingerprinting for good while respecting user consent.
Thus, it’s not just about identifying threats - it's also about safeguarding experiences.
About The Author

Amit Chahal is the co-founder and Data Science head at Sign3, brings over a decade of experience in machine learning and financial fraud solutions, transforming how businesses safeguard against risks.